Sat-cit-ananda
  One outcome
  of Shankara’s monumental blunder was the
  attribution of sat-cit-ananda
  (roughly meaning being/truth, knowledge/consiousness
  and bliss (earlier ananta, suggesting
  limitlessness) to (the nirguna)
  Brahman/Atman/Prajapati or even the identity of
  sat-cit-ananda with the (nirguna =
  unqualified) former. That was a serious error of observation. Had Shankara taken the unqualified tattvamasi seriously,
  meaning as actually stated in the Upanishad, his followers, right up to the youthful
  (meaning immature) Vivekananda, would have realised that sat-cit-ananda happens as saguna Brahman
  (= Atman/Prajapati, and which means as all life
  forms which ‘are Brahman’) response if and when the Brahman/Atman/Prajapati dharma is completed within any saguna state
  (i.e. as mundane, meaning delimited niche attainment).  In other
  words, if and when a (localised) form (and of which there are n, and ‘all of
  which are Brahman because tattvamasi)
  completes (and so perfects) its dharma, and thereby the universal dharma of
  which it and/or its local dharma happens as fractal elaboration, it
  experiences ananda (i.e. bliss, joy,
  happiness and so on) + sat + cit. If and when a form fails to complete its
  dharma, and thereby the universal dharma, leaving both incomplete, it
  experiences
  dukkha (pain, unhappiness and
  so on) + sat + cit. In this
  regard see my book: ‘How to
  make and fake happiness’ Determining
  the goal of sramanic (hence adolescent) endeavour to
  be sat-cit-ananda (= brahman/atman/prajapti) was
  fundamentally flawed (in much the same way as deciding that orgasm is the aim
  of sex or that the purpose of life is happiness). The goal of all life forms
  is the completion/perfection of their (local or personal) dharma/law (as
  fractal elaboration of the universal dharma/law of creation). Sat-cit-ananda happens as
  side-effect of completion/perfection of any and every (local or personal)
  dharma whereby the content of the dharma is irrelevant (i.e. any and every
  completed dharma will do the trick) and the quality of completion/perfection
  is relative to the initial and end states of the form attempting to complete
  its dharma/law/rules set.  |