The
Fuzz word
According to New Oxford Dictionary
opinion, a word is defined as: a single distinct (?) meaningful element1
of speech or writing; or as: a single distinct (?) conceptual unit of
language. For ‘fuzzy’ read: unclear, frayed, foggy, vague, cloudy,
indistinct or incomplete, therefore uncertain. A fuzz word is an element2 of speech or writing that
is ambiguous, indeed, multiguous, thus vague, because it has multiple meaning. A fuzz word appears initially to a naïve, undecided hearer (or
reader) as meaningful because he/she does not discriminate. What the naïve
hearer (or reader) does is superimpose his/her own meaning, derived from her/his
own experience, upon the word, thereby making it distinct.3 In fact, every word4
is fuzzy in that every word
merely vaguely represents an ongoing and ever varying personal experience but
is not actually that experience. A word is an arbitrary sound bite (or
scratch mark) on an arbitrary map that is not an actual territory. Hence the meaning
of a word4 changes from territory (i.e. from user or circumstance)
to territory (i.e. to user or circumstance). A word is fuzzy if and when it conveys multiple meanings or
concepts so that it can mean anything one wants it to mean. Obviously, such
words as ‘home’, ‘I’, ‘car’, ‘fish’, ‘Brexit’, ‘heaven’, ‘soul’ ‘God’ are fuzzy
since all
the former have multiple meanings. A fuzz word is created to describe a fuzzy experience. Since the fuzz word presents as a single unit5 it initially
appears distinct, thereby suggesting that the experience (hence personal
meaning) it symbolises is also distinct. However, once understood as fuzzy the word cannot be processed to closure
thereby leaving the individual in a kind of trance or coma during which he or
she cannot respond.6 A (relative) non-fuzzy word becomes
(relatively more) fuzzy if and when it acquires many different meanings or none derived from
many different experiences or none. A fuzzy word becomes non fuzzy if and when it is examined discretely and its
meaning is decided.7 Hence, ‘the devil8 is in the
detail’ and ‘God9 is in the grand fuzz.’ The advantage of using a fuzz
word is that it creates multiple
choice options. Its disadvantage is that it offers no clear outcome. Politicians and priests who seek to
control and manipulate their charges use fuzz words10 (fundamentally
red herrings)
deliberately either to indicate a general but uncertain direction to be
followed (or experience to be achieved), thereby avoiding a clearly defined
goal and so responsibility of both parties for failure. Or they use fuzz words to
confuse or create anxiety or fear,11 the latter function being
their primary mode of softening up the already confused and anxious, thereby
sustaining or increasing control and power over them. ©
2014 by Victor Langheld |
1. The word ‘element’ is a fuzz word because it has multiple
meaning and so is undecided, vague, uncertain, incomplete and so on. Its very
fuzziness (or ambiguity, actually multiguity) gives it increased (creative) application
flexibility. 2. An element, i.e. a quantum of identifiable realness,
presents as dynamic emergent. All dynamic emergents, such as the human, the
dung-beetle, the bacterium or the entire universe (as ever changing processes)
are fundamentally fuzzy. They are un-fuzzed by momentary quantisation. 3. He/she arbitrarily quantises the fuzzy field/process
of the observed by quantising his/herself, i.e. by stilling or stopping his/herself
as dynamic process. 4. Every dynamic emergent. 5. i.e. as a quantum that is capable of 1 to 1
transaction or contact. 6. It’s for this reason that politicians and priests communicate
with fuzzy words and fuzzy concepts since both cannot be closed (i.e. decided)
and thereby impeded the hearers’ decision making capacity. 7. The undecided hearer is trapped and cannot move on. 8. i.e. the light bringer, i.e. enlightenment that
defines detail and so permits closure and completeness. 9. i.e. the darkness bringer, i.e. endarkenment that
keeps open and incomplete. 10. Fuzz
words are fundamentally red
herrings. 11. i.e. resulting from
non-closure, incompleteness, non-decision and so uncertainty. signalled with
increased disress. |