|
Dualism1,2 as red
herring3 Consider the dung beetle4
as a whole task5 completing unit. As an identified6
whole, thus single reality the dung beetle7 serves as
self-regulating8 physical device that executes a specific function
that changes and upgrades the world.9 To complete its task-as-function the
whole unit10 of the dung beetle applies 2-to-n sub-functions, the
major ones being the ‘Body’ that
physically applies its whole function and a Guide & Control function
(elsewhere named ‘Mind’11) that serves as self-regulation (thus
navigation) system. Depending on the development stage of
the observer, the juvenile human12 selects the Guide & Control
function (i.e. the ‘Mind’) as crucial and, consequently, denigrates the role
of physical application (i.e. the ‘Body’).13 By contrast, the mature adult14
considers a units function-as-a-whole as crucial.15 So it is that the juvenile16
selects the Guide & Control System rather than the body17 as GOD. That’s because he/she believes, not yet
being to participate in the world,18 that
‘whatever rules19 is GOD.’ And the adult,20 and who
does not select because being a full participant in the world by actually
shaping and so making the world (good), experiences that only he/she as whole
unit completes the whole function-as-task is God.21 So it is that the adult
(-as-pantheist) realises that GOD (i.e.
universal rule as such) is really his/her iconised compression of the
universe of all the Gods22 (as
individual rules aggregate). © 2019 by
Victor Langheld |
1. The notion of 2 (hence of numbers as such) is a
false inference, hence a red herring. The icon
2 stands for 2 ones, hence for a minimum series. Only 1 is a true number
(indeed fact as decided quantum).. All numbers stand
for ever lengthening series of 1’s. Hence mathematics is a human fiction,
albeit a useful one. 2. Dualism divides. Division adds rule and so gives
power to the divider (to wit: ‘divide and rule’), a fact not lost on priests
and who exploit division to gain power for themselves. Dualism states that
there is ‘this’ and ‘that.’ Monism states that there is only ‘this’, ‘that’
emerging as variation of ‘this.’ Vedanta failed to understand the notion that
‘there is only THIS.’ 3. A red (i.e. smoked) herring is used to lay a false trail that
serves/functions as exciting, i.e. enlivening, thus (possibly) enlightening
diversion. 4. The beetle as dynamic task completing system is
identified (and named) by what it does. ‘Is’ (i.e. ‘being’)
emerges (i.e. as observer response) as reified (i.e. stilled and held over)
doing. 5. For ‘task’ read: function, procedure, program and so
on. Liberation (from the task), Sanskrit: moksha, is achieved if and when the (indeed any) task is
ended, hence when a problem is solved. 6. i.e. by its waste recycling function. Like the human,
the dung beetle scavenges lower order inputs (i.e. constrained, thus ordered
energy packets) to reconstruct and regenerate itself in order to survive. 7. The dung beetle here stands for all identifiable
realities and their aggregate, called the world (or universe). By using the
dung beetle rather than the human as reference the heat is taken out of the
deliberation. 8. For ‘self-regulating’ read: self-ordering. 9. For ‘world’ read: the (or any) aggregate of
alternate self or other regulated physical (i.e. real) devices. 10. A whole unit operates as (multiplex) singularity. 11. The notion of ‘mind’ is fuzzy as is the verbal icon
standing for it. 12. i.e. the incomplete because immature human who yet
separates (i.e. divides) the singularity into its components and by selecting
the Guide & Control (i.e. regulation) function over the body (i.e. the
physical application function) emerges as dualist theist. 13. i.e. the ‘body’ (or flesh), i.e. the ‘material world.’
St Paul, who sold out to Plato’s adolescent idealism and the Jewish crap
about the body as repository of sin/failure (see: Genesis 2 and ‘Whereas by
one man sin came into the world, and so on’) selected ‘mind over matter’ or
‘spirit over flesh’ or ‘heaven over the world (as vale of woe)’ with
absolutely horrific consequences for all Christians. Idem the fanatic
Catholic Descartes’ phoney dualism. Idem the dodgy ‘atheisms’ of Jainism, Samkya-yoga, Buddhism and so on. 14. i.e. the pantheist as holist. For him/her there is no
division, meaning: ‘All, warts and all, is
GOD’
(as universal ordering function). 15. In other words, the dualist theist (hence
henotheist) selects one sub-function as crucial (i.e. ‘good’) whereas the
holist pantheist considers the single outcome of a unit’s whole application
function as crucial (i.e. ‘good’). Which means that for the juvenile because
selective (thus dualist) theist the (wrongly universalised) Guide &
Control function is paramount/good whereas for the mature pantheist the (i.e.
every) singular outcome of whole application is paramount/good. 16. i.e. the human (henotheist) transiting between infancy
and adulthood. 17. i.e. the allegedly ‘insensate’ matter and which
he/she denigrates, disparages, indeed (fanatically) vilifies, equates with
evil, sinfulness, badness and so on as did the religious fanatics St Paul,
the Jains, Samkyas, Buddhists and so on. 18. And when he/she has to pay the high price for lunch,
namely to live. The infant gets ‘free lunches’ for which later on the adult
has to pay. 19. i.e. orders, i.e. constrains, limits, thereby creating
identity. 20. i.e. as mature pantheist who contributes to the world
by applying his or herself with his/her whole (i.e. complete) body and Guide
& Control System. 21. And because he/she actually makes the world she
experiences his/herself, that is to say, both Guide & Control System and
body as good. 22. To wit, that a forest emerges as collective or
aggregate of individual trees. And from which he/she deduces that GOD (i.e. the ruler, regulator, constrainer-of-energy/spirit)
happens as distributed network (of Gods)
and that therefore the gods and GOD are identical, i.;e.
not different (Sanskrit: advaita). See: The pseudo pantheism of Vedanta |