The Pantheist’s anarchy
The pantheist believes that ALL is
GOD. That means that he believes that each and everything that
makes up the ALL1 is GOD2 too, albeit a fractal
elaboration. The implication of his belief is that GOD,
namely the principle3 of creation, happens as distributed creation
network. Which means that each localised GOD elaboration, hence god, performs
the GOD function of self-elaboration as niche operation.4 That means that each god as mere niche
operation of GOD is compliant5 with the primary GOD operation as
creation principle but non-compliant6 with alternate god
operations, hence with secondary G.O.D. operations. It follows that the pantheist7
rejects local gods who claim to be (or represent GOD), no matter how powerful
or efficient,8 in favour of the complete
equality of the gods in their role as localised GOD manifestations. In short, the pantheist believes in a
level playing field for all gods.9 So she, as anarchist, hence one
who refuses compliance with the dominant order10 of an alternate
god, strives to equalise all gods,11 thereby returning a
relatively ordered system12 into one of perfect disorder13
wherein each bit14 can elaborate itself perfectly in the manner of
GOD. So it is that the henotheist, a local higher
complexity monarch regulating a (creative) power pool of local gods,15
wins the survival struggle in the short and relative term, but the pantheist (i.e.
the lower complexity anarchist) triumphs in the long and absolute term.16 © 2018 by
Victor Langheld |
1. For ‘ALL’ read: all GOD niche elaborations, hence
all gods, meaning all real quanta. 2. For GOD read: the acronym G.O.D., standing for
General Ordering Device. Therefor the gods operate as local ordering devices
applying, i.e. elaborating the general ordering modus locally. 3. The principle, meaning the one without a second, so
the Upanishads, happens as a virtual function until applied in practice and
when it becomes secondary. 4. For instance, the principle of making a hamburger is
applied in identical manner by a zillion hamburger makers albeit with
differential outcomes dependent on their cooking talents-as-capabilities. Thus
is hamburger making a wholly distributed process (or network). 5. The pantheist complies with the basic creation
principle and which results in her self-perfection, the latter being experienced
with ecstatic happiness. So the true pantheist functions as an anarchist, as
the ultimate law onto her (niche) self. The monarchist she throws Molotov Cocktail at his a scaled up anarchist. The anarchist
operates as a scaled down monarchist. 6. The pantheist does not comply with the secondary
creation function (or order) of the henotheist since it disrupts his primary
function by means of which he reaches perfection = heaven. The henotheist
reaches perfection (goodness and so on) by complying with the secondary
order, i.e. by perfecting the set of secondary rules (or commandments),
thereby actually fulfilling the primary order and so reaching perfection, and
heaven too on two counts. So the henotheist wins the day, at least in the
short run. 7. The absolutist monotheist (the quantum, Leibnitz’s
monad) emulating the G.O.D. creation program within his unrelated, thus
singular world-as-G.O.D. niche. 8. The relative monotheist emulating the G.O.D creation
program within his related, because actually networked (i.e. having multiple
connections) niche world. 9. And which happens when ‘nature does its thing’ over the
very long run. 10. For ‘dominant order’ read: monarchy, actually the
tyranny (order) of one over the many (orders). Hence: ‘Thou shalt have no the
gods but me!’ 11. Having many (to n) gods,
i.e. order systems (i.e. monarchies) opens connectivity, as globalisation and
fair trade do. 12. That actually restricts the individuals freedom to
apply G.O.D.s order (or rules), thereby preventing her perfection as a G.O.D.
niche. 13. To wit: maximum entropy, hence of total anarchy. 14. i.e. as god, i.e. as niche application of G.O.D., hence
as monarch (deciding her own rules/laws) in her own right. 15. albeit demoted to tertiary status, hence lesser monarchs. 16. That is to say, when ‘dust returns to and functions
perfectly as dust’, possibly before it is once again turbulated
(by a Big Bang) and spontaneously ordered into real, identifiable, because
relative form by the G.O.D function (or algorithm). |