Pan’theus ≈ the common The pantheist calls the order^1 that is common toand therefore the basis of^2 all differently ordered systems GOD.^3 She believes that GOD serves^4 as the ordinary^5 from which the extra-ordinary^6 emerges. In other words, the pantheist infers that G.O.D. ‘is’ the common denominator of all the uncommon^7 that emerge (as identifiable realities). Thus: W = G (1,2,3,4, …to…n)c^2 Whereby W stands for this and all worlds, G stands for the basic order generating, thus operating system.^8 1,2,3,4,…to…n^9 stand for G derivative (or differential) ordering systems quanta (i.e. apps) and c^2(i.e. squared) stands for 1:1 contact^10 between any two God differential quanta. What the pantheist infers and then experiences as God is the ordinary in the extra-ordinary, the common in the uncommon.^11 Hence the pantheist’s common^12 God-as-source-of-the world serves as the (hidden) ground (ordering function) of all surface applications (i.e. the world as totality of niche ordering systems). And that world, as totality of identifiable realities, can be known only by the interaction of its alternate^13 surface applications.^14 Home © 2018 by Victor Langheld

1. Meaning ‘the ordering function’, i.e. the function that orders disorder, i.e. that eliminates entropy. That function is quantised, digital. 2. Nowadays called ‘the basic operating system’. The basic operating systems is identical, i.e. the same for all its differential apps. And because ‘same for all’ it is indifferent to all. Hence Pan’theus, God as All, does not, cannot interfere, as the Epicureans rightly pointed out. 3. For God read the acronym G.O.D., standing for General Ordering Device. In other words, the pantheist calls the act of ordering absolute (i.e. initial) or relative (niche) disorder GOD. 4. Service is automatic, spontaneous, blind, responsive. In short, God, and all ITS differential iterations (i.e. niche applications), operate as blind self-organising, self-regulating automatons. They ‘self-drive’ without an actual self-as-driver. This was the very early Buddhist view. 5. Elsewhere interpreted as the ground from whichall surface phenomena, i.e. the extraordinary emerge.That’s what the Christian mystic Meister Eckhart claimed, and who was duly excommunicated, and possible murdered, for his non-Christian, indeed pantheist view. 6. The extra-ordinary, i.e. super-ordinary, emerge (i.e. bootstrap or self-organise themselves) as more complex albeit less flexible ordering systems, hence as more effective (i.e. survival efficient) local applications. 7. The uncommon (i.e. the extra-ordinary) emerges as differential iteration (i.e. fractal elaboration) of the common (as fractal). 8. Thus W = G, i.e. ‘the world is God’ (i.e. the saguna Brahman of the Upanishads). The totality of local niche applications is identical with the basic ordering operating system of which they emerge as differential iterations/copies. 9. 1,2,3,4 … to ,,, n symbolize and endless number of local God iterations, i.e. God apps. 10. 1:1 contact happens in a relativity vacuum, thus producing a moment ≈ quantum of realness (symbolized as 1c^2). 11. What the henotheist, more aptly descried as the ecotheist infers, i.e. because she chooses to exist within a selected, hence niche world ≈ home ≈ temple, and then experiences as God is the extraordinary in (often above) the ordinary, and so on. 12. Thus universal, ubiquitous, all-present, all-supporting, albeit indifferent because same for all. 13. The henotheist (i.e. ecotheist) experiences and so treats the phenomena of the world (as differential God applications) as ‘other’. The pantheist experiences and so treats the phenomena of the world (as differential God applications) as ‘alternatives’. 14. What is known, i.e. experienced is the relative affect (upon an observer) of relative interaction between extra-ordinary order alternatives.