St Paul, the liar
‘Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon
all men, for that all have sinned.’ Romans 5:12 No other lie
dreamt up by a religious fanatic has had such a destructive and demoralising
effect upon European and Arabian humanity as the above off the cuff remark by
the Jew Saul of Tarsus turned Christian St Paul. Here is a classic example of
the victim of a crime being blamed for the crime. It was St Augustine of
Hippo who with his flaky notion of Original Sin, derived from Paul’s lie,
eventually turned all human victims, even the righteous, into sinners (i.e.
criminals) and gave the Christian Church absolute power over its charges. And the
(alleged) crime was and is ‘system’s failure’ (to wit: sin)
that results in (disease, old age and) death. The Jew Saul derived his
opinion from the archaic Jewish fable of Adam & Eve, deliberately
redacted by a Hebrew priest from a simple passage story in the Gilgamesh Epos
into a Jewish crime and punishment story. Someone other than the creator
himself (to wit, the Elohim) had to be blamed for failure (i.e. sin ≈
evil) in the world. Ever female hating, the Jewish priest who concocted the
Adam & Eve story, and the female (flesh) hating Jew Paul who misused the
story, claimed that system’s failure (i.e. sin) was acquired (following
Lamarck) by the disobedience of the female and then transmitted to her
offspring (in the semen of the male, so St Augustine). The trumped up charge
of disobedience was neither admitted nor proven in the story, as anyone who
seeks the truth can read. Sin, i.e.
system’s failure (and death, i.e. when feeder becomes fodder), is not an
acquired trait but a necessary design element (inserted by God and/or
mutation + natural selection). Obviously, had death not been intended/planned
by the Elohiym (to wit: the ‘Powers’) there would have been no need for a
Tree of Life in the Kindergarten in Eden. What the liar
and religious conman Saul of Tarsus deliberately fails to tell his Roman
readers is that in the story that purports to describe the Fall (so Martin
Luther) into failure (i.e. sin) the Adam is actually raised to the status of
the Elohiym. In short, the adam is promoted (to the status of an Elohiym ≈
god ≈ merely adult) rather than demoted.* But then, Paul was a
religious fanatic who cared nought for the truth. Genesis
3:22 “And Yehovah** Elohiym said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and bad: and so on…” *… and which makes the question about the need of ‘the
second coming’ (to wit, the 2nd Adam) so intriguing and the reason
for his outburst on the Cross, namely: ‘Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani.’ **… The word Yehovah is suddenly, probably belatedly
introduced into the story to bring it up to date with the later invention of
the notion of Yehovah. Developments
in the notions of God © 2016 Victor Langheld |