Pantheism fundamentals
|
Automaton This pantheist1 believes that: Each and every quantum of order2
emerging as identifiable reality3 operates as automaton.4,5 Each and every quantum of order making up the
cosmos6 emerges and then operates as blind7 automatic
response to disturbance.8 In other words, when
activated/energised,9 the order emerging procedure (i.e. GOD10) responds by blindly emerging order quanta (i.e. the gods) and which are blindly cognised11
as identifiable reality. Since each emerged quantum of order12 recursively
replicates the blind automatic order emerging procedure,13 i.e. GOD, each quantum of order (i.e. a GOD application14)
operates automatically and blindly, hence as automaton. © 2020 by
Victor Langheld |
1. Or monist, such
as some early Upanishad philosophers and Taoists. The dualist (including the
pseudo mono-theist) believes that ‘creation’ happens as intentional act from
outside. i.e. by one ‘other’, hence
heteromatically and believed to be supernatural.
The pantheist/monist believes that ‘creation’, i.e. the real identifiable
world, happens within, that is to say, as automatic self-reaction or
self-response to unpredictable and spontaneous disturbance, such as, for
instance, the Big Bang. The pantheist is not a non-dualist, the latter designation being an intentional
(and mysterious) ambiguity and a deliberate political fudge. 2. Or regularity,
for instance a regular complex pulse. 3. i.e. in the
observer as the latter’s analogue response to a quantised (or digital)
instructions transmission. 4. i.e. As a
procedure that automatically and (initially) blindly self-organises,
self-regulates, self-designs (i.e. self-selects for survival) and so
on. Activated by and responding (i.e. adapting) to each new because differential
input the automaton learns (by comparing to previous inputs) to (re-) cognise
the incoming input, therefore to see (in hindsight, like a blind man making
contact with a stick). 5. The dualist,
for instance the pseudo monist theist, i.e. the ‘my’ God theist, such as the Christian or
Vaishnava, believes that order is generated pro-actively from beyond or
outside, i.e. by a transcendent force or power (i.e. God or the Elohim, i.e. ‘powers’), i.e. by an un-natural or supernatural
‘other’ or heteronomous power. 6. For cosmos
read: the totality of all quanta of identifiable realness and their ensembles
or clusters. The monist believes in the self-emergence and self-continuance
(i.e. survival) of each and every quantum of order and that no ‘second’ or
‘other’ that might intentionally cause disturbance and impose order exists
(eternally or infinitely) as potentiality or actuality. 7. i.e. The quantised
(analogue) response (i.e. as identifiable realness) is activated by a
quantised random, thus unpredictable dynamic event-as-disturbance, i.e. as
quantum of momentum = energy. Both contact and response are blind because
activation and completion (i.e. the completion of the order generating
procedure and its contact with an alternative completed procedure and which
produces momentary realness) happen at random. 8. Emergence of an
identifiable reality, i.e. as order quantum (i.e. m), occurs as quantised,
i.e. limited (analogue) response to a quantised disturbance. Ending (or
death) of an identifiable reality happens if and when disturbance (i.e.
energy input) ends. Note the 2nd aphorism of Pantanjali’s
Yoga Sutra: “Yoga is the elimination (indeed ending) of the fluctuations
(read: disturbance) of consciousness.” 9. i.e. by a
quantum of random momentum = energy (or e), whereby the quantum of momentum
collides, connects, contacts or strikes as the rate of c. Contact between 2
random quanta of momentum in a relativity vacuum, hence presenting @c,
produces a c2 moment of isness or
realness. 10. Applying the
verbal icon ‘GOD’ to the (or any and every) dynamic
order emerging (or generating) procedure and its dynamic product is optional
though useful as placebo for the immature and incomplete for whom a heteromatic origin is comforting and consoling. 11. Cognition (i.e.
knowledge, awareness, to wit, internally generated ‘sight’, i.e. recognition)
emerges as automatic analogue response to quantised instruction by a random
or differential quantum of momentum (or disturbance). 12. For instance, Spinoza’s
natura naturata. 13. For instance, Spinoza’s
natura naturans. 14. In other word,
each and every order quantum as identifiable dynamic reality operates as a GOD app, hence as
a god. |