Pantheism updated
|
Why pantheism sucks (The) One (GOD/RULE1),
because same for all,2 has no identity,3
hence is not communicable. Because not communicable (the) One cannot increase (my) survival capacity,
therefore sucks.4 My One
(God/Rule5), hence the One customised6,7,8
for my9 benefit, has identity, hence is communicable. Because
communicable My One (God/Rule) increases
my survival capacity.10,11 In short, pantheism ‘sucks’ because it’s indifferent. © 2020 by
Victor Langheld |
Analysis (The) One (GOD/RULE1),
because same for all,2 has no identity,3
hence is not communicable. Because not communicable (the) One cannot increase (my) survival capacity,
therefore sucks.4 My One
(God/Rule5), hence the One customised6,7,8
for my9 benefit, has identity, hence is communicable. Because
communicable My One (God/Rule) increases
my survival capacity.10,11 In short, pantheism
‘sucks’ because it’s indifferent. © 2020 by Victor Langheld |
1. i.e.
Pantheos, i.e.
one (unselected) size, shape, hat, lipstick or GOD that fits/suits all hence
does not give me (or my family, my tribe, my nation) a survival edge (and no
reason to go to war to murder, pillage and rape, i.e. to predate). 2. Same
is ‘not different’, hence cannot make a difference. Sameness lacks attributes
(i.e. difference), (to wit: Sanskrit: nirguna) which
alone can communicate. Sameness ensues if and when difference is compressed
out. Or, to explain it in the ancient Buddhist way: ‘Nirvana ensues if and when painful turbulence (Pali: vana) that causes
difference subsides.’ 3. For
‘identity’ read: a quantum of difference deriving from the imposition of an
alternate constraints set/procedure, thus an attribute, that identifies. 4. Since
all emergents operate as dynamic, i.e. thermo-dynamic
procedures, they automatically dissipate (i.e. ‘suck’) energy (i.e. decay) unless
recharged (by communicating-cum-predating thermo-dynamic quanta identified by
difference). In short, there’s no communication between the same, hence all dissipate
to maximum entropy. 5. i.e.
Henotheos, i.e.
the one (selected, hence bespoke) size, shape, hat, lipstick of God fits/suits
me and so gives me (or my family, my tribe, my nation) a survival edge (i.e.
as defence mechanism and as reason to go to war and/or murder, pillage and
rape, i.e. to predate). 6. For
‘customized’ read: selected, tailor-made, bespoke, specifically tweaked,
adapted, thus cultured. Customized means superimposing a selected (for
survival increase) rule, hence adaptation, upon the given (or same for all) natural
(because common to all) rules template. 7. Hence
the ancient Greek comment on (the different) religions, namely “Custom,
custom!” 8. i.e. differentiated,
thus identifiable, thus capable of making contact. 9. Expand ‘my’ to mean: my family, horde, tribe, clan, cluster of like-minded, nation and so on. 10. My
(differentiated) ONE God (as monarch and,
of necessity predator) is identifiable by his/her bespoke difference. As his/her
adherent or follower I transfer that identity, i.e. his/her tweaked constraints-cum-rules
set, to myself and behave or identify accordingly. My altered (i.e. henotheist) identity differentiates me from my
previous peers who had no identity. Their previous identity, lost in
sameness, now emerges as an alternate identity (i.e. the unbelievers and
therefore enemies) and who now become legitimate prey. 11. Hence
the justifiable denigration of the pantheist
by the henotheist. For, the pantheist steals the henotheist’s
thunder by eliminating the latter’s difference (i.e. ego constituents
as an identifiable self). |