One can’t tango
It takes 2 (meaing: 2 alternate 1’s) to tango. 1 to 1,* hence @c2 contact, creates (a quantum
or moment (i.e. as stopped momentum) of) realness. 1(i.e. One, for instance, the
Brahman or God) alone (i.e. without a second or alternative) remains unreal.
If the ancient and mightily flawed Indian definition of realness, namely
‘eternally abiding’, is applied, then an eternal 1 (to wit, the
Atman/Brahman) is real, albeit virtually. However, virtual reality cannot be
experienced as such, notwithstanding the claims made by ancient Indians and
restated by the Brahmin bookworm Adi Shankara. Simple
observation (intensified as personal experience by means of selective to a
point concentration) suggests that (the experience of) realness happens as
result of 1 (whole quantum or ens**) to 1 (whole quantum or ens)
contact in a relativity vacuum, hence @ c2.*** A series (or
network) of c2 contacts produces a (relative, thus presenting with
a self) line experienced as real. A complex or network of contact series
(i.e. @c2) produces/creates a (relative, thus
presenting with a self) form experienced as real. Since ‘only random events
(meaning: @ max. entropy quanta as contacts) carry instruction’, meaning that only quanta
@ rest can strike, i.e. make contact, a strike, i.e. a contact between 2
random (meaning differential) events (hence as @c2 moments) is
needed to create (a quantum of) realness. In simpler
terms, a real form, such as a human or a blade of grass, happens as
multidimensional (i.e. ND rather than
3D) output/imprint (within a Bose-Einstein quantum concentrate) of a multiple
discrete strikes/contacts series in much the same way as the printout of an
archaic dot matrix printer. The dodgy but
politically useful notion put forward by very late commentators of the
Upanishads, and seemingly derived from Shankara and
Badarayan et al., that the pantheistic Braham/Atman
is sat-chit-ananda
could only apply to the saguna, hence to the
‘tango-ing of 2 Brahman/Atman applications (i.e. as
fractal elaborations). At best the nirguna
Brahman/Atman can by fantasised as merely virtually real because eternal. *… In the pantheistic world, the two 1’s are not opposites or others
but alternatives, i.e. alternate fractal elaborations. **… ‘ens’
is short for an ‘enstasy’, to wit, an enstatic,
meaning ‘steady’ (because at either maximum or minimum entropy) state. ***… The momentary
c2 realness quantum, lacking relativity, is not identifiable,
hence does not present as a self. A
series of c2 moments presents with a (transient) self and whose
extension (over time) depends on the number of contacts in the series.
Shankar together with the ancients claimed that an abiding (i.e. eternal)
self/SELF that is real exists (though he offered no proof but scripture (i.e.
sruti)).
The Shakyamuni (later named the Buddha) rejected the notion of an abiding
(i.e. eternal) self/SELF. About momentary selves he said nothing. |