Pantheism updated
The theist
believes: ‘This isn’t THAT’ The pantheist
believes: ‘This is THAT’ |
Finer
detail A modern pantheist’s GOD definition The pantheist’s notion of
good and bad The Pantheist’s understanding of
meaning The
Pantheist’s no difference non-position Pantheism
as thought experiment Under construction Earlier version of this site |
‘This whole world is Brahman’ Chandogya Upanishad, ca 600 BC) + ‘I am Brahman’ (aham brahmanasmi) Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, ca 600 BC ‘A (and thus THE) procedure (or algorithm) that emerges order may be called GOD.’ + ‘Cognizable Order emerges as GOD manifestation’
Victor (1973) The pantheist infers
(and chooses to believe) from the evidence provided by nature (and not human
fantasy, for instance religious scripture) that an automatic basic order enabling procedure generates all cognizable realities. This order enabling procedure (or algorithm) he/she chooses to name GOD. Hence all cognizable
realities that make up the universe enact the GOD procedure in equal
measure, albeit locally constrained (and so differentiated) by alternately
enacted GOD procedures. In short, each and
every identifiable (because ordered) realness moment (hence a GOD moment)
of which this (and every) universe is made up manifests one specifically
constrained application of one basic order enabling procedure. Thus: ‘ALL ‘is’
GOD’ Hence: ‘I’m a god APP’ (and so are you!). Thus: ‘I’m GOD in my niche.’ © 2020 by Victor Langheld |
Meet Tiffany, the dung
beetle, And Tiffano, the ball of
shit. The name
Tiffany is long for theophany, meaning:
manifestation of GOD God as (every)
dung beetle God as dung God as each and
every dung bacterium God as every
chemical element of dung God as every
atom God as every
sub-atomic particle God as every
Planck constant h Idem all nn (i.e. n to the
power of n) alternate theophanies. The dung beetle, representing every quantum of
order (as discrete on-going emergent), reverses entropy. In other words, like you and me it constructs
more order (and so more effective information/meaning, such as a new dung
beetle) from less order (and so lesser effective information/meaning, such as
shit). As order upgrading device it performs the GOD procedure perfectly. |
Analysis The pantheist1
infers2 (and chooses to believe) from the evidence provided by
nature (and not human fantasy, for instance religious scripture) that an
automatic basic order
enabling procedure generates all cognizable realities. This order3 enabling
procedure4 (or algorithm) he/she chooses to name GOD.5,6 Hence all cognizable7
realities8 that make up the universe enact the GOD procedure9
in equal measure10 albeit locally constrained (and so
differentiated) by alternately enacted GOD procedures.11 In short, each and
every identifiable (because ordered) realness moment (hence a GOD moment)
of which this (and every personal) universe is made up manifests one
specifically constrained application of the (one) basic order enabling
procedure. Thus: ‘ALL ‘is’
GOD’ (in action).12 Hence: ‘I’m
a god APP’ (and so are you and every other cognised quantum of realness in the
cosmos). From which follows
that: ‘I’m GOD in my
niche.’13 © 2020 by Victor Langheld |
1. (Greek) pan = all and theos = god. The pantheist believes that ‘All (i.e. the cosmos) is God’. More specifically stated: every
single emergent (as, indeed, the cosmos in itself) in the universe is GOD (i.e. a GOD APP). Consequently: ‘Nature is
GOD’, i.e. ‘natura naturans’. 2. New Oxford Dictionary (NOD): ‘infer =
deduce or conclude from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit
statements.’ Inference is uncertain. In an uncertain and dangerous
world inferences (like beliefs) serve as survival supports. 3. NOD: ‘Order = The arrangement or disposition
of (people or) things in relation to each other according to a particular
sequence.’ Origin: Latin ordo, ordin
‘row, series, rank’ The modern pantheist interprets order to mean: ‘a repeating series of (random) events’. (Victor 2003) 4. NOD: procedure (to wit: algorithm) = ‘an
established (by repetition! (my insertion)) way of doing something.’ A
procedure is quantised (like the game of LEGO), meaning that order (i.e. as stilled or sliced ordering) happens as a discrete
bit (or byte), i.e. unit or quantum, presenting as a repeating limited series
of random events. 5. GOD is defined as: the (indeed any and every)
procedure that enables the emergence of order. As order enabling procedure GOD happens anonymously. GOD ended, i.e. as
sliced or stopped (thus quantised) procedure presents as a as an identifiable
reality. In short GOD as order enabling procedure remains anonymous, i.e. unidentifiable. Hence the true pantheist likewise
remains anonymous. 6. The word GOD is believed to have originated from the proto-germanic
word ghut-om, derived from ghau, meaning: call or invoke (i.e.
a supreme being). The belief in (a) GOD, specifically a transcendent God, serves as
very user friendly (and in Judaism also unfriendly) survival prop. 7. Cognizable because ordered and because
ordered identifiable. 8. ‘A reality’, i.e.
a realness moment happens if and when two random events (or quanta) collide
at the capacity of c, thus as c2, thereby creating an actual
effect. Realness is quantised (i.e. unitised), not
continuous, as the ancients, such as the wise guys who invented the
Upanishads, wrongly inferred. 9. The GOD procedure (that enables cognizable,
because real and identifiable) order) serves as basic operating routine that
enables the (continuous, albeit discrete) emergence (and upgrading) of
complex order platforms, such as the human or flea or sub-atomic particle. 10. ‘In equal measure’ means: same for
(common to) all. Because same for
all, the procedure (i.e. GOD) is not cognisable since only difference is cognised. 11. Since only difference (i.e.
differential order) can contact, thereby making make real and generating
identity, the universe (even as private and personal cosmos) actually
consists of differential order complexes that instruct and shape (i.e.
inform) each other by contact. 12. The
(fundamentally passive!) GOD procedure is activated by
random momentum (i.e. energy). When random momentum
(and so the energy supply) ends (for instance at death), so does the GOD procedure. At death (i.e.
at failure to access energy and thereby failing to sustain order) a given
real identity, i.e. a GOD app (for instance Aristotle’s
soul), demerges and ceases. From which follows that the pantheist, being GOD, i.e. one of n active GOD apps, has
(i.e. requires) neither a soul nor an afterlife. Belief in the soul and an
afterlife are useful henotheist placebos. 13. Every
cognisable reality emerges as the localised effect of the non-local GOD procedure. It sustains itself (i.e. survives) as GOD by repeating its procedure and for which it needs
to acquire energy (i.e. random momentum). This it does by predating and
scavenging alternate GOD procedures.
Initially GOD’s (and every god’s) predatory
(re-)action is blind. |